Hillary Clinton is Dangerous and Her Resume is Too “Thin?”

Hillary Clinton thin resume, Hillary Clinton too dangerous, Hillary Clinton not qualified for president

There is a problem with the claim that we should question the heft of Hillary’s electoral record and the suggestion that two U.S. Senate wins isn’t enough campaign experience for a presidential candidate.

There are plenty of right-wing critics who think Hillary Clinton is “dangerous.”  Some progressives think she’s dangerous because they dubbed her too “hawkish” after her vote in favor of the Iraq War (though men, like Joe Biden and John Kerry who also voted for the Iraq War Resolution weren’t considered hawkish for the very same vote).

Now the political site Vox  is calling Hillary’s electoral record “thin” and believes an uncontested HRC run for the Democratic presidential nomination would be “dangerous” because she “botched” her 2008 run for the White House:

Also, apparently some Clinton Foundation contributors are risky to her campaign and Democrats:

Oh, and she might be a vampire:

OK, he wasn’t really calling her a vampire (was he?), but it’s this sort of criticism, also now being practiced by David Axlerod, that’s dressed up with a little faint praise that can damn a candidacy even where there’s not much there there.

But there is a problem with the claim that we should question the heft of Hillary’s electoral record and the suggestion that two U.S. Senate wins isn’t enough campaign experience for a presidential candidate. If Vox is going to argue that she hardly has any electoral record to run on, then surely a little historical fact checking would have come across the following information:

— Ronald Reagan only had two election victories before running for White House. Oh, and let’s not forget that Reagan failed to win the Republican presidential nomination twice before making a successful bid for the White House.

— George H.W. Bush had only two congressional race victories before he was elected vice president (and really, does anyone vote for the VP in a presidential campaign?). If you’re going to call Hillary’s resume thin in the campaign department, then let’s apply the same to Bush I.

— And George W. Bush only won two elections before his presidential run. And I’d be so bold as to suggest his “business” background and one failed congressional campaign don’t really beef up his political CV.

So why single out Hillary? Are they suggesting that being Secretary of State isn’t as good as an Ambassadorship to Japan or owning a baseball team or being an actor?

This anti-Hillary argument put forth by Matthew Yglesias and Vox is a bit thin itself, in my opinion. Although they have one thing right — Hillary is dangerous, if by dangerous they mean she will probably be the first woman president of the United States. Dangerous because she’ll have an agenda this time that focuses on women and families.  Dangerous because she’s already gotten all the “mistakes” out of her system from 2008.

I’ll take that kind of dangerous.

Joanne Bamberger is an independent journalist and journalism entrepreneur who is also the author/editor of book Amazon bestseller “Love Her, Love Her Not: The Hillary Paradox” (She Writes Press). She is the publisher and editor in chief of The Broad Side, and is the principal of Broad Side Strategies, a strategic communications firm.

  • teresaInPa

    Hillary’s resume is thin compared to WHO? M.Y. is an idiot and he and the rest of the media can shove their click bait articles and tweets. What a lot of twits. I really can not understand why there are so many women who will buy this nonsense and not vote for her. Women are our worst enemies sometimes. We really need to be better informed and stop allowing men to keep us from our very leaders out of their own sexism.

  • SophieCT

    We would be lucky to have her as president. Hillary 2016 for the win!

  • Kelsy

    hillary is very dangerous on foreign policy and left winged radical ideas, I would be scared to death to vote for her

Why I Wrote “Trumping And Drinking”
Get Over Yourselves. We’re All Rory Gilmore
Hillary Clinton, Shake It Off, Taylor Swift, Hillary Clinton Campaign song
Six Reasons “Shake It Off” Should Be Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Theme Song
Nancy Reagan dies, Just Say No, Ronald Reagan
A Not-So-Positive Ode to Nancy Reagan’s Frothy “Just Say No” Campaign
I Married for Health Insurance
Why I Wrote “Trumping And Drinking”
A Case of Nixonian Deja Vu
Post-Election Munchies: What is Your Grief Snack of Choice?
Why I Wrote “Trumping And Drinking”
A Case of Nixonian Deja Vu
Trump Reality Check, Now with Actual Facts!
Fascism Facts
I Married for Health Insurance
Get Over Yourselves. We’re All Rory Gilmore
Post-Election Munchies: What is Your Grief Snack of Choice?
Women’s Elections Rights in Saudi Arabia: A Token Drop in an Abysmal Bucket & the Plight of Women Under Sharia Law
Maybe It Wasn’t Rape: Emerging Matriarchy and the Altering of Women’s Past Sexual Narratives
Paris attacks, Paris terrorism
Is Paris Burning?
Chinese government and women's reproductive rights, adopting Chinese girls, international adoption
Dear Xi Jinping, I Am Writing to You as an American Mom of a 19-Year-Old Chinese Daughter
The Vital Voice of Hillary Clinton: Part 1
Maybe It Wasn’t Rape: Emerging Matriarchy and the Altering of Women’s Past Sexual Narratives
The Eyes Have It!
Ashley Madison, Jared Fogle, sex, rape, sexual affairs
Ashley Madison vs. Jared Fogle: Rape, Sex and Hacking in America
women's viagra, Viagra, Flibanserin, sexual arousal, women's desire, sex after menopause
That “Little Pink Pill” Isn’t All It’s Cracked Up to Be

Get our new weekly email
Broadly Speaking

featuring our best words for the week + an exclusive longread