Outing of a Different Kind: On Jezebel and Racist Tweets

Image via White House Flickr stream/Pete Souza

A while back I wrote about Gawker‘s outing of Michael Brutsch, the infamous “troll” at Reddit who posted obscene material for fun under the pseudonym “ViolentAcrez.”

Now Gawker‘s sister publication is at it – but with a twist. Jezebel has decided to share some of Election 2012’s greatest hits of racism on Twitter from high school-aged kids – and they actually reported the kids to their schools’ leadership. (Note – this story link and this story link are still up, but they have some really nasty language.) If you’re concerned about clicking the links, suffice it to say there were a lot of people using “the N-word” to describe our recently re-elected President. And worse.

Again, there are some differences here. The people Jezebel pursued made no attempt to hide their identities. They put their racist epithets right next to their names and pictures of their faces. They made these comments publicly on a Twitter feed they have to know anyone can search. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy here. I do note that Jezebel apparently decided not to search for the identities of those who tweeted racist comments under pseudonyms – even though I’m sure it’s not that hard for a decent hacker to get that information. They are on much more solid legal footing when they simply report the obvious facts as opposed to digging for more.

What is reasonable, I think, is to cringe a bit over this. These kids are old enough to know better, but kids make mistakes sometimes, and now they have been publicly branded as racists. Just a few years ago statements like these wouldn’t be immortalized on the Internet. Millions of people read Jezebel every month. I know that if anyone applies for work at my company, particularly to work in social media, we’d check them out on the various social platforms. Maybe do a Google search. Let’s just say this wouldn’t go over well.

The more I think about it, however, the more I think this is what you have to expect in the digital age. You have to own your words. And for these kids, it now seems those words own them.

Cross-posted from David Wescott’s blog, It’s Not a Lecture

  • Mason

    Free speech only grants you the right to speak. It does NOT mean you cannot get in trouble if your speech is used to physically or emotionally harm anyone else, it does NOT mean that your speech cannot be CHALLENGED by someone else’s.

    We all enjoy the fact that the Internet lets us say things behind the magical cloak of anonymity, but if you use that as an excuse to say horrible, RACIST things, like the kids whose tweets got outed on Jezebel, then you deserve whatever punishment and derision you get.

    This is 2012. The color of someone’s skin, or their country of origin, or their religious beliefs or lack thereof, or sexual orientation, or gender, or WHATEVER should matter about as much as the amount of hydrogen atoms in their body. And you can bet that you’ll never see anyone getting derided for only having 1.752 trillion atoms in their hand as opposed to 1.853 trillion or whatever.

women and aging, Frances McDormand, embracing matronly
Why “Matron” Isn’t a Four Letter Word
lego_beauty_tips
Is Lego Beauty Trolling Our Daughters?
Laettner
Blame March Madness for Why We Hate Christian Laettner
Supreme Court women LEGO set
Dear LEGO, We Want The Supreme Court Women’s Legal Justice League Set for Our Daughters
Photo Credit: Amazon.com, Wikimedia Commons
Monica Lewinsky Is Not A Hapless Innocent
women on 20s roosevelt
The Future Of Money: Gimme Me Five Roosevelts
meangirls2
Why I’m Teaching My Daughter Traits of a Mean Girl
patricia arquette un speech
Patricia Arquette Got It Right This Time and Nailed Her Speech On Fair Pay
Ted_Cruz_by_Gage_Skidmore_6
Why Ted Cruz Needs Obamacare and Why It Matters
women's rights in Afghanistan
No Peace for Women in Afghanistan
mikulski-image-2
On Senator Barbara Mikulski, Cancer, and Feminism
department of justice ferguson mo
DOJ Report Condemns Ferguson Police Department
women and aging, Frances McDormand, embracing matronly
Why “Matron” Isn’t a Four Letter Word
women in science, climate change, Ted Cruz
Women in Science: Ted Cruz Needs to Talk with This Professor About Climate Change
Photo Credit: Amazon.com, Wikimedia Commons
Monica Lewinsky Is Not A Hapless Innocent
meangirls2
Why I’m Teaching My Daughter Traits of a Mean Girl
women and aging, Frances McDormand, embracing matronly
Why “Matron” Isn’t a Four Letter Word
boston-bomber-cover
Where Is Michael Brown’s ‘Humanizing’ Magazine Cover?
obsessive compulsive disorder children
Is He Always Like This?
alizagraying_edited-1
I Am Not My Gray Hair. My Hair Is Not Me.
SBEMH-Graphic4
The Space Between Love and Fear
sexual women on TV, sexual role models
Powerful Sexual Female Role Models of a “Certain Age”
reinvention culture, Oprah and reinvention, More Magazine and reinvention, women stop reinventing yourselves
Reinvention Culture is Killing Me
Vintage_Valentine_02
Cupid’s Weekend Cocktails: It Takes Two

Get our new weekly email
Broadly Speaking

featuring our best words for the week + an exclusive longread