To Ban “Bossy” or Not?

Bossy girl 2Better that 500 bossy girls go free, than that one leader girl be discouraged. Or something like that.

Sheryl Sandberg, the COO of Facebook who urged us to “lean in,” is now teaming up with others asking us not to call girls “bossy” in her “Ban Bossy” campaign. To a certain extent, the sentiment makes sense, because studies have shown that the same behaviors that get called leadership in men are called bossy (or worse) in women. On the flip side, the blogosphere is alight with people who rightly point out that actually being bossy, whether a boy or a girl, is not the kind of behavior we should encourage in our children.

Aside from the fact that I don’t love the idea of being the language police and telling people what words they can or can’t use, part of the issue of banning a word is that it’s not just gener that leads to women being called bossy. I have scolded one son not to “boss [other sons] around.” If I had a daughter who was doing the same, I doubt I would be doing her any favors holding back that critique. If your playmates find you bossy and unpleasant, it is a safe bet that you won’t have those playmates for long. Now many a child and adolescent who has struggled with being different can testify that the problem may, indeed, lie with the playmates, not the child. Perhaps many women who find themselves as the lone woman in the boardroom feel the same. But to categorically say that other people’s negative perceptions of our behavior ought not to influence it, is quite another thing.

Much like the line between confidence and arrogance, the line between bossiness and leadership may be in the eye of the beholder. But it isn’t only gender that matters. I suspect that many people who are leaders are also, at times, bossy. The same son who has been scolded at home for being bossy was described as a “natural leader” at our parent-teacher conference. And I do not believe it is the same behavior described differently. I think the same tendency (assertiveness?) can, at different times, present as bossiness or leadership. The great struggle for each person is to avoid the former and reach for the latter. Having feedback when the behavior veers into bossiness seems, to me, a good thing in this struggle to reach for leadership.

For a boy, the opposite of “bossy” might be “leader,” which is the critique we intend to deliver. But it is possible that for girls, the opposite of “bossy” is… “supportive”? I struggle to think of female role models that girls might see as exhibiting leadership but not bossiness. Show me a female leader and I’ll show you tons of people (not just men) who find her polarizing or bitchy or bossy or any number of negative adjectives. One doesn’t get to be a leader without being, at some point, bossy and the idea that you can be seamlessly a leader without veering into the unsavory aspects (always confident, never arrogant) seems to me unlikely. It seems the demure supportive wife in the wings is the best role model girls have as the opposite of “bossy.” The strong woman behind the famous man. The woman who is respectful, selfless, and a good team player. The woman who is definitely not bossy, but also not a visible leader, at least not one that would ever upstage her male partner.

My “bossiness”/leadership has been a consistent part of who I am and I am always trying to avoid the former and reach for the latter. I don’t know that if I’m being bossy it’s helpful not to tell me so, but the issue is that the same behavior by men and women is viewed differently. This is why I think actually banning the word “bossy” isn’t good, but on the flip side perhaps the discussion this campaign has generated is the best part. It’s not that we shouldn’t call someone out on unsavory behavior, but increasing our own awareness that we perceive that behavior differently depending on the sex of the person exhibiting it is a good thing. It should give us pause every time we describe someone as “bossy,” whether they happen to be male or female, and perhaps work to show them what we see as its opposite.

Denitza Blagev is a pulmonologist and mother of three.  You can follow her on Twitter @mybetterdoctor, Facebook and on her blog

Image via iStockphoto

  • Will Bassler

    First of all, I think that we need to define the word bossy. This coming from a person who worked from the age of 14. Up until retirement. (Yeah I am real old ) I don’t attribute a bossy person to a person who has leadership abilities. Quite the opposite, a bossy person thinks that they have the right to tell other people what to do. (Rather they do or not) They order people around and used fear and intimidation to get things done . There a lot of second lieutenants during the Vietnam War that found out that doesn’t work real well.

    A person with leadership abilities, leads by example and instills confidence in the people under them. Having worked in the lowest Ranks of the business world all the way up through Being a supervisor And later a plant manager for a couple of companies and on the BOD of for one. I can honestly say there a number of people out there that are bossy in business and they have no right to the positions that they hold other than the fact that they got there by again fear and intimidation Yes there are those that have worked hard. Putting in long hours and are also bossy, but again they use fear and intimidation to get the job done. That doesn’t make it right the way that they treat people nor do they have leadership abilities. but it is been my experience over the years that the people that are the true leaders their people follow them and put out the extreme efforts because there leader has asked them to do it, Not because they were ordered to do it. For somebody that thinks bossy works in the business world, they need to go back and look at the Westinghouse study.

    At no time should we confuse being bossy with leadership , and I think it’s time that parents took an active role in explaining that difference to their children. There are a lot of people out there that are bossy that could be good leaders if they stopped and took a look at what they are doing instead of continuing to trying to Rationalize through the use of terminology their actions and thereby trying to justify it.

women and aging, Frances McDormand, embracing matronly
Why “Matron” Isn’t a Four Letter Word
Is Lego Beauty Trolling Our Daughters?
Blame March Madness for Why We Hate Christian Laettner
Supreme Court women LEGO set
Dear LEGO, We Want The Supreme Court Women’s Legal Justice League Set for Our Daughters
Photo Credit:, Wikimedia Commons
Monica Lewinsky Is Not A Hapless Innocent
women on 20s roosevelt
The Future Of Money: Gimme Me Five Roosevelts
Why I’m Teaching My Daughter Traits of a Mean Girl
patricia arquette un speech
Patricia Arquette Got It Right This Time and Nailed Her Speech On Fair Pay
Why Ted Cruz Needs Obamacare and Why It Matters
women's rights in Afghanistan
No Peace for Women in Afghanistan
On Senator Barbara Mikulski, Cancer, and Feminism
department of justice ferguson mo
DOJ Report Condemns Ferguson Police Department
women and aging, Frances McDormand, embracing matronly
Why “Matron” Isn’t a Four Letter Word
women in science, climate change, Ted Cruz
Women in Science: Ted Cruz Needs to Talk with This Professor About Climate Change
Photo Credit:, Wikimedia Commons
Monica Lewinsky Is Not A Hapless Innocent
Why I’m Teaching My Daughter Traits of a Mean Girl
women and aging, Frances McDormand, embracing matronly
Why “Matron” Isn’t a Four Letter Word
Where Is Michael Brown’s ‘Humanizing’ Magazine Cover?
obsessive compulsive disorder children
Is He Always Like This?
I Am Not My Gray Hair. My Hair Is Not Me.
The Space Between Love and Fear
sexual women on TV, sexual role models
Powerful Sexual Female Role Models of a “Certain Age”
reinvention culture, Oprah and reinvention, More Magazine and reinvention, women stop reinventing yourselves
Reinvention Culture is Killing Me
Cupid’s Weekend Cocktails: It Takes Two

Get our new weekly email
Broadly Speaking

featuring our best words for the week + an exclusive longread