Yes, Abortion Should Be Between a Family, Their Doctor…and Their Surrogate

Reproductive rights revolve explicitly around the argument that all medical procedures should be between a woman, her doctor, and, when applicable, her partner or family.  There is no other case than in a woman’s right to choose where so many politicians, activists and outright strangers feel it is not only their job but their actual right to insert themselves into a private health care decision.  It is never appropriate for anyone unrelated to weigh in on another person’s physical health care situation.

No, not even if we are talking about a Romney.

The media is aghast at reports that Tagg Romney, son of Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, allegedly had a document drawn up  detailing medical situations and decisions between himself, his wife and their surrogate during multiple attempts to have children.  The younger Romneys, who were unable to conceive themselves, hired a surrogate twice to help them build their family.  The surrogacy itself was supposed to be somehow a political gotcha — after all, Romney as a presidential candidate says that he supports the idea of granting fertilized eggs full personhood recognition, a policy that many believe would make in vitro fertilization illegal or at the very least much less effective.

But deep within the draft of the surrogacy contract lurked a number of clauses that described under what situations either side of the agreement could terminate the pregnancy.  For the Romneys, an abortion could be obtained if the resulting fetuses had fetal anomalies or genetic defects, or if one fetus had a condition that could potentially harm the other. The surrogate would be able to initiate a termination if her health was put in danger by the pregnancy.

Many media outlets and progressive sites are positioning the contract as an obvious moment of hypocrisy on the part of Romney family, with Mitt declaring that abortion should only be available in circumstances of rape and the health of the woman carrying the pregnancy.  Maybe.  But if so, it’s no more hypocritical than supporters of reproductive rights gleefully exposing a private medical contract covering when a family may choose to terminate a pregnancy.

Just as the story of Karen Santorum’s early induction of a non-viable fetus has been wrongly used to try and criticize former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum and his extreme, no exceptions anti-choice agenda, what the Romney family does medically speaking deserves just as much privacy as does any family deciding when to have a child, when to not have a child, and in what situations they may decide that an abortion is in their own best interest.

Let’s keep private medical decisions between patients and doctors, regardless of the patient.  Yes, even when that patient may be unlikely to do the same on our behalf.

(photo image by ekem, Courtesy: RWJMS IVF Program [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons)

  • GloPan

    I agree that medical information should be private, but when something like this becomes public, when it involves a family that would have great influence on policy that would prevent me from doing the EXACT SAME THING, then I feel I have the right to vote accordingly.

women and aging, Frances McDormand, embracing matronly
Why “Matron” Isn’t a Four Letter Word
lego_beauty_tips
Is Lego Beauty Trolling Our Daughters?
Laettner
Blame March Madness for Why We Hate Christian Laettner
Supreme Court women LEGO set
Dear LEGO, We Want The Supreme Court Women’s Legal Justice League Set for Our Daughters
Photo Credit: Amazon.com, Wikimedia Commons
Monica Lewinsky Is Not A Hapless Innocent
women on 20s roosevelt
The Future Of Money: Gimme Me Five Roosevelts
meangirls2
Why I’m Teaching My Daughter Traits of a Mean Girl
patricia arquette un speech
Patricia Arquette Got It Right This Time and Nailed Her Speech On Fair Pay
Ted_Cruz_by_Gage_Skidmore_6
Why Ted Cruz Needs Obamacare and Why It Matters
women's rights in Afghanistan
No Peace for Women in Afghanistan
mikulski-image-2
On Senator Barbara Mikulski, Cancer, and Feminism
department of justice ferguson mo
DOJ Report Condemns Ferguson Police Department
women and aging, Frances McDormand, embracing matronly
Why “Matron” Isn’t a Four Letter Word
women in science, climate change, Ted Cruz
Women in Science: Ted Cruz Needs to Talk with This Professor About Climate Change
Photo Credit: Amazon.com, Wikimedia Commons
Monica Lewinsky Is Not A Hapless Innocent
meangirls2
Why I’m Teaching My Daughter Traits of a Mean Girl
women and aging, Frances McDormand, embracing matronly
Why “Matron” Isn’t a Four Letter Word
boston-bomber-cover
Where Is Michael Brown’s ‘Humanizing’ Magazine Cover?
obsessive compulsive disorder children
Is He Always Like This?
alizagraying_edited-1
I Am Not My Gray Hair. My Hair Is Not Me.
SBEMH-Graphic4
The Space Between Love and Fear
sexual women on TV, sexual role models
Powerful Sexual Female Role Models of a “Certain Age”
reinvention culture, Oprah and reinvention, More Magazine and reinvention, women stop reinventing yourselves
Reinvention Culture is Killing Me
Vintage_Valentine_02
Cupid’s Weekend Cocktails: It Takes Two

Get our new weekly email
Broadly Speaking

featuring our best words for the week + an exclusive longread