Anne of Green Come-and-Get-Me

Photo: Amazon

When I first saw the new—and suddenly buzzed about —cover for the reissue of the classic series Anne of Green Gables, my mind went instantly into cynical and jaded mode with reflex speediness. I flashed to the classic (okay, well feminist classic) No Comment photos. Because, let’s face it, someone in the marketing world decided to “rebrand” Anne in ways that anyone who knows the books will find offensive.

How bad is it? It’s pretty darn terrible, that’s how bad.

The books, as described in someone’s Amazon review:

“The Anne of Green Gables Series is a wonderful collection of tales about a bright, spirited, lovely young woman.”

The reviewer offers five stars and the promise that the books are great for girls, boys and adults, too.

The Anne on the new cover is seated in a chest-first manner and appears to have had her hair not only styled, but also airbrushed. Come-hither Anne is no rugged country girl. Nor is the “real” Anne blonde.

So now we’ve got: One Green Gable? Avonlea 90210?

It’s possible that like so many inappropriate messages kids and teens get there could be some enterprising teen protesting—as happened with Seventeen Magazine last year, for example, when a plea for more realistic depictions of young women was met (after a great deal of pressure was exerted). The “No Photoshop” pledge was largely due to determined efforts by a fantastic eighth-grader named Julia Bluhm.

I hate to imagine that teenagers have to fight for every image they see—or don’t see. As much as I flipped to the No Comment photos first when Ms. Magazine arrived, the truth is that mindset—look how terrible and maybe we can shame x company to change for the better—is really an exhausting one. It’s not the way I wish for my sons and daughter to have to see the world (obviously, I am grooming them to do just that, though; advertisers and marketers and the machines of sports, Hollywood and even politics determine that they must be literate, grumpy media consumers if they are to consume at all).

The idea that if we just “sexy-up” the book’s cover it’ll become that much more appealing is so assaultive to the book’s merits, the intelligence of girl (and boy) readers and almost to the act of reading itself. It’s like saying that you can’t read a book unless you are lured into the mundane act by the promise of a little sex appeal. We—and our girls and boys—are so much better than that.

Sarah Werthan Buttenwieser is a freelance writer whose work has appeared in the New York Times, Brain Child Magazine, Huffington Post and Salon, amongst others. She keeps a personal blog, Standing in the Shadows. Follow her on twitter–@standshadows

  • I find myself saying “that is appalling” a little too often these days, but DAMN, that new Anne cover is AP-PAL-LING. Unbelievable. Jaw-droppingly bad.

    What’s next, a tarted up version of the March sisters in a new edition of “Little Women”? Alice slinking through Wonderland in a bikini?

  • Wow, this really is over the top! I must admit, I did not read Anne as a girl. I only discovered her from the Canadian TV series I watched happily with my daughters. I think they read the first book at some point. This will appall them as well. Love Shannon’s question about Little Women. If Colleen Dewhurst were alive we would have a leader in this fight!

  • Totally ridiculous, but is it genuine? I’m looking on Amazon, and don’t see this cover anywhere. Can you provide a link?

  • I’ve seen a lot of articles on this and I admit I’m annoyed that not one so far has mentioned that the publisher of this book is a self-publishing outfit, not one of the big publishing houses. I don’t know who approved this cover but it wasn’t necessarily anyone trying to sex-up the book. It’s very possible it was someone who never read it at all.

    It’s also worth noting that there if you search just the book section on Amazon there are THOUSANDS of hits for Anne of Green Gables.

    Is this appalling? Sure. But is it worth the uproar? No.

  • If it was controversy they were after, they got it but it seems more likely that it was a bad choice by someone who didn’t know what the book was all about.

Why I Wrote “Trumping And Drinking”
Get Over Yourselves. We’re All Rory Gilmore
Hillary Clinton, Shake It Off, Taylor Swift, Hillary Clinton Campaign song
Six Reasons “Shake It Off” Should Be Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Theme Song
Nancy Reagan dies, Just Say No, Ronald Reagan
A Not-So-Positive Ode to Nancy Reagan’s Frothy “Just Say No” Campaign
I Married for Health Insurance
Why I Wrote “Trumping And Drinking”
A Case of Nixonian Deja Vu
Post-Election Munchies: What is Your Grief Snack of Choice?
Why I Wrote “Trumping And Drinking”
A Case of Nixonian Deja Vu
Trump Reality Check, Now with Actual Facts!
Fascism Facts
I Married for Health Insurance
Get Over Yourselves. We’re All Rory Gilmore
Post-Election Munchies: What is Your Grief Snack of Choice?
Women’s Elections Rights in Saudi Arabia: A Token Drop in an Abysmal Bucket & the Plight of Women Under Sharia Law
Maybe It Wasn’t Rape: Emerging Matriarchy and the Altering of Women’s Past Sexual Narratives
Paris attacks, Paris terrorism
Is Paris Burning?
Chinese government and women's reproductive rights, adopting Chinese girls, international adoption
Dear Xi Jinping, I Am Writing to You as an American Mom of a 19-Year-Old Chinese Daughter
The Vital Voice of Hillary Clinton: Part 1
Maybe It Wasn’t Rape: Emerging Matriarchy and the Altering of Women’s Past Sexual Narratives
The Eyes Have It!
Ashley Madison, Jared Fogle, sex, rape, sexual affairs
Ashley Madison vs. Jared Fogle: Rape, Sex and Hacking in America
women's viagra, Viagra, Flibanserin, sexual arousal, women's desire, sex after menopause
That “Little Pink Pill” Isn’t All It’s Cracked Up to Be

Get our new weekly email
Broadly Speaking

featuring our best words for the week + an exclusive longread