Crosses on the Riverfront

_R6H6735The town nearest to my home, of any size, is Evansville, Indiana.  An interesting lawsuit has the attention of local pundits and wannabee pundits, bantering back and forth in the comments of the local paper several times a week.

The leaders of the city recently approved a  request to place 30 eight-foot-tall crosses on the city’s riverfront as part of a Vacation Bible School project by a Christian church.  The crosses will be painted/decorated by young children and displayed in this public park area bordering the Ohio River.

Many cities have, for the past decade or so, featured art projects like this.  I remember visiting Philadelphia several years ago when the city was filled with decorated “Phanatics”, the symbol of the Philadelphia Phillies baseball team.  Washington, D.C. had pandas at one time and Cincinnati had decorated pigs.  In some cases, these works of art (I use the term “art” loosely) were auctioned off and the funds given to charity.

The crosses are due to be displayed from August 4 through August 18.  Two Evansville residents, with the help of the American Civil Liberties Union, are suing the City of Evansville because they believe that by allowing these crosses on public space, the city has made a government endorsement of Christianity.

The local newspaper said, “The debate’s focus is whether the “Establishment Clause” in the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment prohibits displays such as the crosses on public property, or instead prohibits governments such as Evansville’s from rejecting such displays.”

The lawsuit has also generated an editorial response from the newspaper as one of the two individuals suing the City is also a freelancer at the local newspaper (full disclosure: I am also a freelancer writer at that newspaper).

I am also a Christian, and I don’t hide my proverbial light under a bushel. But I have a very strong view about this. In my opinion (and that of the current law), there is a difference between peaceable assembly to promote one’s ideals at a public place, and symbols of those same ideals on public property. I have a gold cross necklace that I sometimes wear, and I’m proud to note what my religion is.  My family decorates our home for Christian holidays.

But I cannot defend the use of public property to display what is clearly a religious symbol — even if that symbol happens to be the predominant faith in our area.

All of those individuals who are lobbying for these crosses would most likely head for the hills if a Wiccan organization wanted to put up 30 eight-foot symbols of the Wiccan sect on the same public property.

The thought of what someone else might do is not justification for this lawsuit, however.  Every time a discussion like this ensues, some armchair historian reels off all the reasons why our founders wanted our country to be a certain way.

Religion has always been a part of our country — we were founded because of religious repression in the Old Country.   I do not think our forefathers wanted to dictate how religion should be practiced, and that is why we have separation of church and state. Countries that cannot separate the two are dictatorships with a state religion.

What are we teaching our children?  What is the message here?

I had to wonder after several local businesses offered private space to display the crosses.

Those who criticize my religion — or frankly, any religion — often get caught up in these types of public issues.

I can’t speak for Jesus, but I am always wondering about that old saying, “What would Jesus do?”  I cannot imagine that he would think that the fight over this public space was worth the argument.  Why not put the crosses on the church property or on other private property donated by those who share the faith, and let the actions and the artwork speak for themselves?

Amy McVay Abbott is an Indiana writer whose new book “A Piece of Her Mind” is on Amazon as a paperback and eBook. 

  • Amen, Amy! Christians need to start acting like Christians again and stop thinking they are IT … the only avenue to God. I liked your Wiccan analogy and read it just as I was wondering what they would do if the Muslim brotherhood requested an opportunity to display their symbols, whatever they are. Wiccan works.

  • DianaAni

    I agree with your argument, and understand the law does too.

    As a non-christian, I am constantly reminded of the dominant faith/religion/expression in my home town, my work place, my state, and all over the country. I know that, if I were to put on display any other religious form of expression, it would be seen as offensive. So, I stay quiet, mostly. It offends me that every public meeting for miles around is opened by a prayer which — without fail — will include the words, “in Jesus’ name we pray – Amen.” If public spaces started sprouting crosses, it might just feel hopeless.

    I hope these overtly religious art pieces will be moved to non-public spaces. By the way, I like your photo of the old cross, was it taken in Scotland?

  • Great points. Isn’t religion stronger when it is kept out of the government domain?

  • Joan Haskins

    As always, you tell the story so well, Amy. And I couldn’t agree more…

Why I Wrote “Trumping And Drinking”
Get Over Yourselves. We’re All Rory Gilmore
Hillary Clinton, Shake It Off, Taylor Swift, Hillary Clinton Campaign song
Six Reasons “Shake It Off” Should Be Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Theme Song
Nancy Reagan dies, Just Say No, Ronald Reagan
A Not-So-Positive Ode to Nancy Reagan’s Frothy “Just Say No” Campaign
I Married for Health Insurance
Why I Wrote “Trumping And Drinking”
A Case of Nixonian Deja Vu
Post-Election Munchies: What is Your Grief Snack of Choice?
Why I Wrote “Trumping And Drinking”
A Case of Nixonian Deja Vu
Trump Reality Check, Now with Actual Facts!
Fascism Facts
I Married for Health Insurance
Get Over Yourselves. We’re All Rory Gilmore
Post-Election Munchies: What is Your Grief Snack of Choice?
Women’s Elections Rights in Saudi Arabia: A Token Drop in an Abysmal Bucket & the Plight of Women Under Sharia Law
Maybe It Wasn’t Rape: Emerging Matriarchy and the Altering of Women’s Past Sexual Narratives
Paris attacks, Paris terrorism
Is Paris Burning?
Chinese government and women's reproductive rights, adopting Chinese girls, international adoption
Dear Xi Jinping, I Am Writing to You as an American Mom of a 19-Year-Old Chinese Daughter
The Vital Voice of Hillary Clinton: Part 1
Maybe It Wasn’t Rape: Emerging Matriarchy and the Altering of Women’s Past Sexual Narratives
The Eyes Have It!
Ashley Madison, Jared Fogle, sex, rape, sexual affairs
Ashley Madison vs. Jared Fogle: Rape, Sex and Hacking in America
women's viagra, Viagra, Flibanserin, sexual arousal, women's desire, sex after menopause
That “Little Pink Pill” Isn’t All It’s Cracked Up to Be

Get our new weekly email
Broadly Speaking

featuring our best words for the week + an exclusive longread