On Steve Jobs and the Future of STEM Education

via iStock Photo/Yunus Arakon

STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) education is something I think about on a daily basis.  After all, I currently work as a science curriculum designer and I am a former high school science teacher, with hopes to return to the classroom.  I come from a long line of physicists  and engineers and I am married to a “techie.”  To say that STEM education and reform is a passion of mine would be an understatement.

Yet, the death of Steve Jobs had me reeling over the state of STEM education even more than usual.  Mr. Jobs was an innovative tech genius with a entrepreneurial spirit.  He transformed the way that we communicate, do business, invent, work, and play.  He had a vision and surrounded himself with people who could help see his vision to fruition. Nevertheless, I can’t help but wonder when we will see someone of his caliber again.  Are we preparing our students think critically, ask questions, investigate, take risks, and become innovators? Do we give enough attention to scientists and engineers making huge leaps and bounds in their fields by making their findings accessible and interesting to the public?

STEM education has become more important than ever. In order to stay competitive in the world, we need people to think critically and to be able to make connections between the technological, science, and engineering disciplines.  However, STEM education budgets have been slashed and the emphasis on testing has encouraged rote learning. Instead of being able to explain things, students simply want to know the answers.  Experiential learning has taken a back-burner to test preparation.  In the end, our students are falling further and further behind.

Today, my daughter came home from school and saw my NASA/Georgia Tech homework on the dining room table.  It was a motion storyboard with images diagramming the forces acting on a moving object at different points in time.   She questioned me about it, always curious to learn, asking me what each of the diagrams meant.  So, we did what comes naturally.  We experimented with moving objects, testing forces and frictions of various surfaces.  I showed her what each of the diagrams and symbols meant along the way. When we were finished, she was able to describe how forces affect moving objects and explain what the force diagrams illustrate.

She is in second grade.

I tell this story not to brag about how brilliant my young daughter is and how I seized a teachable moment.  I tell this story to make clear that this could be all children.  If you give children the opportunities in science, technology, engineering and math, if you allow them to experiment, explore, and draw conclusions, if you have them develop their own questions and answer them through investigation, children will surprise you.  They are much more teachable and far more intelligent than we give them credit.  Einstein said, “It should be possible to explain the law of physics to a barmaid.”  I am going to expand on that.  It should be possible to explain the law of physics to even young children.  Much of it is inherent. If we don’t jump on the opportunities when they are presented, our children, and therefore, the innovations of our future suffer.

So where do we go from here?  The future of STEM education cannot take place in the vacuum of the classroom.  Collaboration between the community, experts, and schools is a necessity.  Students should not have access to only one authority on information in the classroom; they should have access to many.  Teachers need training and time to implement experiential learning programs like problem based learning.  Reform needs to take place on a local level so that teachers are able to utilize local resources.

Our children have the ability to innovators, engineers, scientists, and perhaps even the next Steve Jobs. But without STEM education reform, I fear our students, and therefore all of us, may be robbed of this future.

  • It’s a scary to realize that these are the things that are falling to the wayside in schools. Most people know about arts and social sciences funds being cut, but with those cuts out of the way, true science learning is also being forfeited. Our kids need the opportunities to explore sciences, not just read in books and be able to take multiple-choice tests. It’s very frustrating as a parent to see what’s not happening in school.

    • In our district, a district that is award winning, science doesn’t get any real traction (some, but not much) until 4th grade. I find that astounding.

  • My sons have been fortunate enough to have truly remarkable teachers. Bird came home from kindergarten one day telling me that nanotechnology was the science of studying really tiny things. His 5 year old mind could grasp that basic principle, making way for more curiosity and interest in science. He has had female teachers who have really nurtured and enriched his interest in science and math while placing emphasis on writing and reading comprehension too. I am amazed everyday at what these teachers are doing. Somehow they are really teaching and letting the kids experiment and experience. The whole testing fiasco neglects the most important tenet of learning – the freedom to try, fail, learn, and try again.

    Oh, when you come back to the classroom, please move to Wake County. I would LOVE for my sons to have you as a teacher!

  • It’s a valid concern. But, in my opinion Steve Jobs wasn’t Steve Jobs because of his background (limited to high school and self-taught as an adult b/c he only had 1 semester of college before dropping out) in STEM education. He was Steve Jobs because he was driven and compelled to CREATE, he had an artists mind more than an engineers mind (think about the design and intuitive flow of Apples versus Mac, Bill Gates is more a STEM guy.) But, I agree with you, it needs to be a focus if we are to innovate and stay completive. Because Steve Jobs wasn’t Steve Jobs without an enormous team of engineers inventing and backing him up.

Why I Wrote “Trumping And Drinking”
Get Over Yourselves. We’re All Rory Gilmore
Hillary Clinton, Shake It Off, Taylor Swift, Hillary Clinton Campaign song
Six Reasons “Shake It Off” Should Be Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Theme Song
Nancy Reagan dies, Just Say No, Ronald Reagan
A Not-So-Positive Ode to Nancy Reagan’s Frothy “Just Say No” Campaign
I Married for Health Insurance
Why I Wrote “Trumping And Drinking”
A Case of Nixonian Deja Vu
Post-Election Munchies: What is Your Grief Snack of Choice?
Why I Wrote “Trumping And Drinking”
A Case of Nixonian Deja Vu
Trump Reality Check, Now with Actual Facts!
Fascism Facts
I Married for Health Insurance
Get Over Yourselves. We’re All Rory Gilmore
Post-Election Munchies: What is Your Grief Snack of Choice?
Women’s Elections Rights in Saudi Arabia: A Token Drop in an Abysmal Bucket & the Plight of Women Under Sharia Law
Maybe It Wasn’t Rape: Emerging Matriarchy and the Altering of Women’s Past Sexual Narratives
Paris attacks, Paris terrorism
Is Paris Burning?
Chinese government and women's reproductive rights, adopting Chinese girls, international adoption
Dear Xi Jinping, I Am Writing to You as an American Mom of a 19-Year-Old Chinese Daughter
The Vital Voice of Hillary Clinton: Part 1
Maybe It Wasn’t Rape: Emerging Matriarchy and the Altering of Women’s Past Sexual Narratives
The Eyes Have It!
Ashley Madison, Jared Fogle, sex, rape, sexual affairs
Ashley Madison vs. Jared Fogle: Rape, Sex and Hacking in America
women's viagra, Viagra, Flibanserin, sexual arousal, women's desire, sex after menopause
That “Little Pink Pill” Isn’t All It’s Cracked Up to Be

Get our new weekly email
Broadly Speaking

featuring our best words for the week + an exclusive longread